Inconsistencies Between Stated and Revealded Preferences: An Analysis of Mobility Patterns in the Metropolitan Area of Pachuca

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29057/jas.v7i14.15461

Keywords:

public goods, urban transport, consumer preferences

Abstract

Mobility patterns and the use of public transport in metropolitan areas have become key elements in the debate on urban development in Mexico. Factors such as population growth and the expansion of cities highlight its relevance in the government agenda and the local economy. This article explores the mobility preferences of higher education students in the metropolitan area of Pachuca, Mexico, considering the inconsistencies in consumer behavior in markets with multiple attributes, such as transportation. To this end, a qualitative approach based on focus groups was adopted, which allowed the relationship between stated and revealed preferences to be analyzed. The results offer an overview of the dynamics of mobility in this sector.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
2
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
No
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
70%
33%
Days to publication 
181
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Academic society 
N/A
Publisher 
Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo

References

[1] Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. Harper and Row.

[2] Becker, G. S. (1976). The Economic Approach to Human Behaviour. University of Chicago Press.

[3] Simon, H. A. (1997). Models of Bounded Rationality: Empirically Grounded Economic Reason (Vol. 3). MIT Press.

[4] Loza, N., & Plancarte Escobar, R. (2022). Introduction: Advances, criticisms, and perspectives in the rational choice approach. Revista Euro Latinoamericana de Análisis Social y Político (RELASP), 2(4), 9-23.

[5] Vidal de la Rosa, G. (2008). The Theory of Rational Choice in the Social Sciences. Sociologica, 23(67), 221-236. s

[6] Bonomé, M. G. (2002). Rationality in Decision Making: Analysis of Herbert A. Simon's Decision Theory.

[7] Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291.

[8] Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.

[9] Heukelom, F. (2007). Kahneman and Tversky and the Origin of Behavioural Economics. Tinbergen Institute.

[10] Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A., & Swait, J. D. (2000). Stated choice methods: Analysis and applications. Cambridge University Press.

[11] McFadden, D. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In P. Zarembka (Ed.), Frontiers in econometrics (pp. 105-142). Academic Press.

[12] Samuelson, P. A. (1938). A note on the pure theory of consumer's behaviour. Economica, 5(17), 61-71.

[13] Train, K. E. (2009). Discrete choice methods with simulation (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

[14] Moureau, N. et Vidal, M. (2009). Quand préférences déclarées et révélées s'opposent : le téléspectateur, un cas paradoxal pour l'économiste. Revue Française de Socio-Économie, n° 4(2), 199-218. https://doi.org/10.3917/rfse.004.0199.

[15] Ben-Akiva, M. (1985). Discrete choice analysis: Theory and application to travel demand. MIT Press.

[16] Gómez, R., & Ruiz, L. (2021). Perceived quality and preference for public transport in urban contexts. Journal of Social Sciences, 34(2), 45-62.

[17] Alonso, M., & Fernández, J. (2020). Urban transport and its determinants: an economic vision. Editorial Científica.

[18] Arévalo, J., & Estrada, H. (2017). Decision Making: A Review of the Topic. Simón Bolívar University.

[19] Samuelson, P. A. (1954). The pure theory of public expenditure. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 36(4), 387-389.

[20] Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. Oxford University Press.

[21] Sevillano, V., López-Sáez, M., & Mayordomo, S. (2010). Emotional consequences of the instrumental and symbolic properties of urban means of transport. Psychology, 1(1), 47-56.

[22] López-Sáez, M., Domarchi, C., & Gutiérrez, J. (2014). Influential factors in the choice of public transportation or cars as the mode of transportation in habitual commutes. Journal of Social Psychology, 29(2), 371–399.

[23] Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Yale University Press.

[24] Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

[25] Krueger, R. A. (2000). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

[26] Paramio, L. (2005). Theories of rational decision and collective action. Sociologica, 19(57), 13–34.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-05

How to Cite

Lopez Callejas, A., & Chiapa Aguillón, E. (2026). Inconsistencies Between Stated and Revealded Preferences: An Analysis of Mobility Patterns in the Metropolitan Area of Pachuca. Journal of Administrative Science UAEH, 7(14), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.29057/jas.v7i14.15461