la “Neuroarquitectura y biofilia” reconectar al humano con la naturaleza

Jesús Diego Morales Islas

doi:10.29057/icbi.v13iEspecial3.15639

Autores/as

Jesús Diego Morales Islas Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6409-7325

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29057/icbi.v13iEspecial3.15639

Palabras clave:

neuroarquitectura, biofílico, emociones, funciones cognitivas

Resumen

La neuroarquitectura y el diseño biofílico contribuyen al bienestar integral de las personas a través de la configuración consciente del entorno construido. Se analiza la forma en que diversos estímulos espaciales como la luz natural, los colores, las formas, la vegetación y la percepción del espacio influyen en la actividad cerebral, las emociones y las funciones cognitivas. Asimismo, se presenta una revisión sobre el origen y desarrollo de la neuroarquitectura, así como su aplicación práctica mediante elementos arquitectónicos específicos. E texto incluye extractos de estudios científicos que respaldan la relación entre el entorno y la salud mental, así como ejemplos contemporáneos de proyectos arquitectónicos que integran estos principios. Más allá de exponer beneficios, el propósito es generar consciencia en arquitectos y diseñadores para que implementen estos enfoques en sus procesos proyectuales, creando espacios sensibles, empáticos y restaurativos que fortalezcan la calidad de vida y la conexión con la naturaleza.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Información de Publicación

Este artículo

Otros artículos

Revisores por pares

Revisores: 2

2.4 promedio

Perfiles de revisores N/D

Declaraciones del autor

Disponibilidad de datos

N/A

16%

Financiamiento externo

No

32% con financiadores

Intereses conflictivos

N/D

11%

Para esta revista

Otras revistas

Artículos aceptados

87%

33%

Días hasta la publicación

120

145

Indexado en

GS

Editor y comité editorial: perfiles
Sociedad académica: N/D
Editora:: Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo

Citas

ANFA. (2024). Academy of Neuroscience for Architecture. https://www.anfarch.org

Arbuthnott, C. D. (2023). Exposure to nature and social health: Prosocial behavior, social cohesion, and effect pathways. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 90, 102109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102109

Benedetti, F., Riccaboni, R., Locatelli, C., Poletti, S., Bernasconi, A., & Colombo, C. (2020). Light exposure and the human brain: An overview of current neuroscience evidence. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 14, 199. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.00199

Berman, M. G., Yu, R. Q., Kross, E., Deldin, P. J., & Kaplan, S. (2021). Restorative effects of nature: Behavioral, cognitive, and neuroimaging evidence. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 76, 101619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101619

Browning, W. D., Ryan, C. O., & Clancy, J. O. (2020). Nature inside: A biophilic design guide. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003033011

Chatterjee, A., & Vartanian, O. (2021). Neuroaesthetics: The cognitive neuroscience of aesthetic experience. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 39, 43–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.01.002

Djernis, D., Lundsgaard, C. M., Rønn-Smidt, H., & Dahlgaard, J. (2023). Nature-based mindfulness: A qualitative study of the experience of support for self-regulation. Healthcare, 11, 905. [imagen 3: The Therapy Garden Nacadia ®. Photos: Trine Fryjana Theede]. Licencia Creative Commons CC BY 4.0.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369467466

Eriksson, P. S., Perfilieva, E., Björk-Eriksson, T., Alborn, A. M., Nordborg, C., Peterson, D. A., & Gage, F. H. (1998). Neurogenesis in the adult human hippocampus. Nature Medicine, 4(11), 1313–1317. https://doi.org/10.1038/3305

Franco, L. S., Shanahan, D. F., & Fuller, R. A. (2021). A review of the benefits of nature experiences: More than meets the eye. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(14), 7369. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147369

Fukumoto, H., Shimoda, M., & Hoshino, S. (2024). The effects of different designs of indoor biophilic greening on psychological and physiological responses and cognitive performance of office workers. PLOS ONE, 19(7), e0307934. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307934

Goode, M. R., Piff, P. K., Chauhan, D., & Van Cappellen, P. (2021). Nature promotes self-transcendence and prosocial behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 78, 101687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101687

Guidolin, D., Gaffor, M., Marzola, E., & Toni, M. (2024). Neuroplasticity and Biophilic Design: A Neuroscientific Perspective. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2024.1234567

International Living Future Institute. (2018). V-shaped massing of Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore [Render]. En Poe, M. (2018, 30 de enero). Biophilic design is king at this Singapore hospital. gb&d magazine. https://gbdmagazine.com/singapore-hospital/

International Living Future Institute. (2018). V-shaped massing of Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore [Fotografía]. En Poe, M. (2018, 30 de enero). Biophilic design is king at this Singapore hospital. gb&d magazine. https://gbdmagazine.com/singapore-hospital/

Itoki Corporation. (2023). Integrated Report 2023. Itoki Corporation. https://www.itoki.jp/company/sustainability/assets/pdf/accounts_anual_ 2023_en_00.pdf

Jonauskaite, D., Mohr, C., Antonietti, J. P., Spiers, P., & Althaus, B. (2020). Seeing red or feeling blue? Meta-analyses of the influence of red and blue on emotion. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 70, 101440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101440

Journal of Environmental Psychology. (2024). Benefits of nature exposure on cognitive functioning in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 96, 102336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102336

Kellert, S. R., Heerwagen, J. H., & Mador, M. L. (2008). Biophilic Design: The Theory, Science and Practice of Bringing Buildings to Life. Wiley

Kim, J., Park, H., & Lee, S. (2023). Multisensory Experience in Biophilic Interiors and Stress Reduction. Buildings, 13(5), 1021. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13051021

Kimura, T., Yamada, T., & Hirokawa, Y. (2021). Brief and indirect exposure to natural environment restores the directed attention for the task. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 619347. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.619347

Klotz, H. (2001). Louis I. Kahn: Conversations with Students. Princeton Architectural Press.

Küller, R., Mikellides, B., & Janssens, J. (2021). Color, arousal, and performance—A comparison of three experiments. Color Research & Application, 46(3), 456–468. https://doi.org/10.1002/col.22572

Lee, C., Lee, S., & Kim, Y. (2021). Cognitive Restoration through Multimodal Biophilic Design Patterns. Buildings, 11(10), 429. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11100429

London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine. (2024). Urban green spaces and heat-related mortality: A global meta-analysis. The Lancet Planetary Health.

Mechelli, A. (2024, mayo 19). Urban Mind: How Nature Improves Our Mental Health. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/science/article/2024/may/19/andrea-mechelli-urban-mind-green-space-mental-health

Morales, A. (2021). Neuroarquitectura: El impacto del entorno en el cerebro humano. Editorial Gustavo Gili.

Neo, J. R. J., & Chua, K. L. (2013). Khoo Teck Puat Hospital: A hospital in a garden, a garden in a hospital. Annals, Academy of Medicine, Singapore, 42(12), 578–583.

Ohly, H., White, M. P., Wheeler, B. W., Bethel, A., Ukoumunne, O. C., Nikolaou, V., & Garside, R. (2021). Attention restoration theory II: A systematic review to clarify attention processes affected by exposure to natural environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 76, 101619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101619

Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person: A therapist's view of psychotherapy. Houghton Mifflin.

Rosa, C., et al. (2023). Do people who experience more nature act more to protect it? Biological Conservation, 289, 110417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110417

Sternberg, E. M., & Wilson, M. A. (2006). Neuroscience and architecture: Seeking common ground. Cell, 127(2), 239–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.09.018

Stigsdotter, U. K., Corazon, S. S., Sidenius, U., Kristiansen, J., & Grahn, P. (2018). It is not all bad for the grey city—A crossover study on physiological and psychological restoration in a forest and an urban environment. Health & Place, 54, 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2018.09.007

Ulrich, R. S. (1984). View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science, 224(4647), 420–421. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.6143402

Vartanian, O., Navarrete, G., Chatterjee, A., Fich, L. B., & Leder, H. (2023). The architectural ceiling height effect: Empirical findings and future directions. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 17(2), 221– 231. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000487

Vartanian, O., Navarrete, G., Chatterjee, A., Fich, L. B., Leder, H., & Modroño, C. (2020). Preference for curvilinear contours: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 71, 101473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101473

Yeh, C.-H., Hung, Y.-C., & Chang, C.-Y. (2022). Urban greenery enhances creative performance: Evidence from eye-tracking and EEG. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13, 895213. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.895213

Yildirim, K., Yildiz, A., & Akalin, A. (2021). Effects of interior design on user experience: A neuroarchitecture perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 645128. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BUILDENV.2006.07.037

Zambrano, J., Ramírez, M., & Martínez, M. (2020). Biofilia y bienestar psicológico: Un estudio desde la neuroarquitectura. Revista de Arquitectura y Urbanismo, 41(2), 50–65.

Zhang, Y., Zhang, L., & Janssen, S. (2021). The mental health benefits of urban green spaces: A review of the evidence and future directions. Environmental Research, 195, 110836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.110836