A methodological proposal to make engineering changes of the automotive industry in the state of Aguascalientes, Mexico
Abstract
This issue depicts the first results of research in car making companies in the State of Aguascalientes, México.
The sort of research carried was qualitative and exploratory. The aim of it is to propose a methodology or a model of technological innovation which integrates the best practices that can comply the engineering changes in the supplying chain. Changes of engineering happen due to changes of model in vehicles. The sample subject to studies is not probabilistic or led by the expert sort. The measuring instrument designed for this specific studies is a questionnaire. This questionnaire takes reference from the elements that form a change a change of engineering gathered in 8 core topics which include information about the activities done in the engineering, finance, planning, industrial engineering, suppliers development and production departments; with a total t 130 activities or items that are the results of the research. Two categories or levels are evaluated. The first one measures the Likert to a level of fulfillment of each of the activities developed during a change of engineering. Then, the second one measures the scale of Likert to a level of importance considered by the expert. The results shown in this issue are unique, given the fact that the topic has not been profoundly studied. The data gotten from the studies belong to the level of fulfillment of the activities that are executed in a change of engineering in 24 car making companies in the State of Aguascalientes. The car making companies involved in this research were assembly companies, direct and indirect suppliers known as Level One or Tier One Suppliers and Level Two or Tier Two Suppliers. These companies perform activities that are mostly described in the questionnaire in a range of evaluated scale, which allows this research to be continued and opens room to other researchers to continue exploring about this topic. These activities are definitely important because big part of the planning, execution and communication among the departments involved depend on it, given the fact that those automotive companies which are willing to adopt this methodology will have more possiblity to accomplish their deliveries on time and assure the quality of their products to their costumers. At the same time, having more earnings and making more business forthese companies as well as it will benefit the State of Aguascalientes and its industry.
Downloads
References
Almohadi A., Dehghan, J., & Ruwanpura, J. (2011). The predictability of fast-track projects. Procedia Engineering.
Bala, K. (2014). Supply chain management: Some issues and challenges-A review. 4(2), 947-953.
Bleicher, K. (2014). Das Konzept Integriertes Management. Frankfurt/New York: Campus Verlag.
Chopra, S., & Meindl, P. (2010). Administración de la cadena de suministro. Estrategia, planeación y operación. México: Prentice Hall.
Christhopher, M. (2012). Logistics and Supply Chain Management. London: Pitman Publishing.
Dashchenko, A. (2006). Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems and Transformable Factories. New York, German: Springer. doi:10826377
Douglas M., L. (2004). The eight Essential Supply Chain Management Processes, Sypply Chain Management Review (Vol. 8). Evanston, Illinois.: Northwestern University, Evanston.
EcuRed. (s.f.). Recuperado el Agosto de 2017, de Conocimiento con todos y para todos: https://www.ecured.cu/Metodolog%C3%ADa
El Sayed, H. (2013). Supply Chain Key Performance Indicators Analysus. 2(1).
ElMaraghy, H. (2005). Flexible and reconfigurable manufacturing systems paradigms. International journal of flexible manufacturing systems, 17(4), 261-276.
García-Vidales, M. A., Campos-García, R. M., & González-Gómez, O. (2012). The influence of logistics activities on the performance of supply chain: Case of automotive sector in Aguascalientes, Mexico. 9228-9235.
Gobierno del Estado de Aguascalientes. (s.f.). Portal del gobierno del Estado de Aguascalientes. Recuperado el junio de 2017, de http://www.aguascalientes.gob.mx
Gomez Bastar, S. (2012). Metodología de la Investigación. Estado de México, México: Red Tercer Milenio S. C.
Gutiérrez Pulido, H., & de la Vara Salazar, R. (2013). Control estadístico de la Calidad y Seis Sigma. México, D. F.: Mc Graw Hill.
Hernández Sampieri , R., Fernández Collado, C., & Baptista Lucio, M. d. (2010). Métodología de la investigación. México: Mc Graw Hill.
Hernández Sampieri, R., Fernández Collado, C., & Baptista Lucio, M. (2010). Metodología de la investigación. México, D.F.: Mc Graw Hill.
Huang, G., Yee, W., & Mak, K. (2001). Development of a web-based system for engineering change management. Robotics and compuring integrate manufacturing, 255-267.
Ibbs, W. (1997). Quiantitive Impacts of Project Change: Size Isssues.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. (2013). Sistema de Clasificación Industrial de América del Norte, México. México: Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. (2014). Estructura Económica de Aguascalientes en síntesis. México: Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. (2014). INEGI. Obtenido de Censos Económicos 2014. Resultados Definitivos.: http://www.inegi.org.mx/est/contenidos/proyectos/ce/ce2014/default.aspx
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. (2016). Conociendo Aguascalientes. Aguascalientes: Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía, & Gobierno del Estado de Aguascalientes. (2016). Anuario estadístico y geográfico de Aguascalientes. Aguascalientes: INEGI.
Instituto Nacional de Geografía e Informática, & Asociación Mexicana de la Industria Automotriz, A. (2016). Estadísticas a propósito de... la Industria automotriz. México: INEGI.
Interanational Automotive Task Force. (2015). Norma del sistema de Gestión de Calidad Automotriz IATF 16949. Integración de las normas ISO-IATF (2015-2016). Ginebra: AIAG.
ISO 2009, ANFIA, FIEV, SMMT, VDA, CHRYSLER, . . . RENAULT. (2009). TECNICAL SPECIFICATION ISO/TS 16949. ISO copyright office.
ISO. (20 de Enero de 2018). ISO. Recuperado el Arbil de 2017, de https://www.iso.org/home.html
Karl, F., Reinhart, G., & Zaeh, M. (2012). Strategic planning of reconfigurations on manufacturig resources. 3, 608-613.
Kernschmidt, K., Behncke, F., Wickel, M., Chucholowski, N., Bayrak, G., Lindemann, U., & Vogel-Heuser, B. (2014). An integrated approach to analyze change-situations in the development of production system. CIRP, 148-153.
Koren , Y., Heisel , U., Jovane, F., Morikawi, T., Pritschow, G., Ulsoy, G., & Van Brussel, H. (1999). Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems.
Koren , Y., Heisel , U., Jovane, F., Morikawi, T., Pritschow, G., Ulsoy, G., & Van Brussel, H. (1999). Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems. 48(2), 527-540.
Lang LaSalle , J. (06 de 03 de 2013). México un punto clave para la cadena de suministros. (Visión Industrial una manera diferente de ver la industria) Obtenido de Jones Lang LaSalle establece cinco razones que así lo consideran: http://www.visionindustrial.com.mx/industria/economia-y-finanzas/mexico-un-punto-clave-para-la-cadena-de-suministros
Mardones , J. (1994). Filosofía de las ciencias sociales y humanas: materiales para una fundamentación científica. Bogotá: Anthropos.
Mittal, K., & Jain, P. (2014). An overview of performance measures in reconfigurable manufacturing system. Procedia Engineering, 69, 1125-1129.
Monje Álvarez, C. (2011). Metodología de la Investigación Cuantitativa y Cualitativa. Colombia: Universidad SurColombiana.
Piplani, R., & Fu, Y. (2005). A coordination framework for coordination supply change inventory alignment. Journ. Manuf. Techno. Manag., 16(5-6), 598-614.
Quecedo Lecanda, R., & Castaño Garrido, C. (Dialnet de 2002). Introducción a la metodología de la investigación cualitativa. Psicodidáctica(14), 5-40.
Secretaría de Economía. (2012). Industria Automotriz. Monografía.
Verma, A. (2015). An Overview of Supply Chain Competitives in Manufacturing Industries: Strategies and Framework.
Walpole, R., Myers, R., Myers, S., & Ye, K. (2012). Probabilidad y estadística para ingeniería y ciencias. México: PEARSON, Educación.
Welch, S., & Comer, J. (1988). Quantitative Methods for Public Administation. Chicago: The Dorsey Press.
Wickel, M., Chucholowski, N., Behncke, F., & Lindemann, U. (2013). Comparison of seven company-specific engineering changes processes. 3rd. International Conf. on model and Mag. of Eng. Processes.
Xu, R., Xiaoli, L., Xiaomin, S., & Gang, L. (2007). The Analysis of Bullwip Effect in Suplly Chain Based on Strategic Alliance. 1, 452-458.
Xuehong, D., Mitchell, M., & Tseng, M. (2006). Understanding customer satisfaction in product customization. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 31(3-4), 396-406.
Zäh, M., Hagemann, F., & Teufelhart, S. (2009). Form-flexible tools for injection molding: approach for the economic appliation of injection molding form small lot sizes. German: German Academic society for Production Enginnering (WGP).
Zäh, M., Reinhart, G., Werner, J., & Aull, F. (2008). Beherrschung zyklischer Innovationen in der ProduKtion. Obtenido de Werstattstechnik online 98: www.werkstattstechnik.de
