Attitudes toward transgender people of Mexican university students

Irina Lazarevich; Luis  Ortiz-Hernández; Lydia López-Pontigo; José Ramón Aguilar-Martínez; Lizbeth Alondra Hernández-Paniagua

doi:10.29057/mbr.v5i10.11761

Irina Lazarevich Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7957-3412
Luis Ortiz-Hernández Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5870-1729
Lydia López-Pontigo Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6901-7909
José Ramón Aguilar-Martínez Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2510-3415
Lizbeth Alondra Hernández-Paniagua Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0206-5812

DOI: https://doi.org/10.29057/mbr.v5i10.11761

Keywords: Attitudes, behaviors, transgender, gender, role, beliefs

Abstract

Introduction: At the national level, research on attitudes towards transgender people is incipient, especially in academic field; therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate attitudes towards transgender people among Mexican college students and their associations with sociodemographic characteristics, orientation to social dominance and egalitarianism. Methods: The sample consisted of 471 undergraduate students between 16 and 29 years old from public universities of México City and Estate of Mexico. The Scales of Attitudes towards Transgender People and of Social Dominance Orientation were applied; socioeconomic characteristics were evaluated.

Results: It was observed that college students had a medium level of acceptance towards transgender people; however, between 2% and 5% of them still maintain attitudes of rejection. Men, religious people, and participants who scored higher on social dominance orientation expressed more negative attitudes toward transgender people and less positive in activism and interest in the topic. The opposite trends were observed among participants with higher levels of egalitarianism.

Conclusions: Negative attitudes toward transgender people can contribute to a hostile environment for this population group in educational institutions. Understanding and recognizing of human diversity by college students, especially health professionals, will enable them to respect this vulnerable population in their future professional activities

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

American Psychological Association. Guidelines for psychological practice with transgender and gender nonconforming people. American Psychologist. 2015; 70(9):832-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0039906

American Psychological Association. Just the facts about sexual orientation and youth: A primer for principals,educators and school personnel; 2019. Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/pi/lgbt/resources/just-the-facts

Consejo Nacional para Prevenir la Discriminación. Glosario de la diversidad sexual, de género y características sexuales, 2016. Disponible en https://www.conapred.org.mx

The National Center for Transgender Equality. Fact sheet on writing about transgender people and issues; 2014. Consultado el 20 de marzo de 2023. Retrieved from http://www.transequality.org/sites/default/files/docs/resources/TransTerminology_2014.pdf

Pons A. From representation to corposubjectivation: the configuration of transgender in Mexico City. TSQ. 2016; 3(3–4):388–411. https://doi.org/10.1215/23289252-3545119

Lozano-Verduzco I, Melendez R. Transgender individuals in Mexico: exploring characteristics and experiences of discrimination and violence. Psychol. Sex. 2021;12 (3):235-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2019.1698449

Bizic MR, Jeftovic M, Pusica S, Stojanovic B, Duisin D, Vujovic S, Rakic V, Djordjevic ML. Gender Dysphoria: Bioethical Aspects of Medical Treatment. Biomed. Res. Int. 2018;13. https://doi: 10.1155/2018/9652305.

The Williams Institute. UCLA, School of Law; 2022. Retrieved from https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/subpopulations/transgender-people/ Cite: 29-09-2022.

Annual Review of the Human Rights Situation of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex People in Europe and Central Asia 2022. Retrieved from https:// www.rainbow-europe.org

Statista Research Department. Gender identity worldwide 2021, by country. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/1269778/gender-identity-worldwide-country/

Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI). Encuesta Nacional sobre Diversidad Sexual y de Género, 2021 (ENDISEG). México, Aguascalientes: INEGI; 2022. Disponible en https://www.inegi.org.endiseg.2022

Hann M, Ivester R, Denton GD. Bioethics in Practice: Ethical Issues in the Care of Transgender Patients. Ochsner. J. 2017;17(2):144-5.

Barbosa Magnus MG, Dias da Silva R, de Barros Seródio AM. Transgender population under the bioethics perspective: a panorama of the curricula and bioethics courses of medical schools of the State of São Paulo. Rev. Bras. Educ. Med. 2020; 44(3). https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-5271v44.3-20190255

Haas AP, Rodgers PL, Herman JL. Suicide attempts among transgender and gender non-conforming adults: Findings of the National Transgender Discrimination Survey. Los Angeles, CA: Williams Institute; 2014. Retrieved from https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/Trans-GNC-Suicide-Attempts-Jan-2014.pdf[15] Anderson VN. What does transgender mean to you? Transgender definitions and attitudes toward trans people. Psychol. Sex. Orientat. Gend. Divers. 2022. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000566

Grant JM, Mottet LA, Tanis J, Harrison J, Herman JL, Keisling M. Injustice at every turn: A report of the National Transgender Discrimination Survey. Washington, DC: National Center for Transgender Equality and the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force; 2011. Retrieved from http://www.thetaskforce.org/reports_and_research/ntds

White-Hughto JM, Reisner SL, Pachankis JE. Transgender stigma and health: A critical review of stigma determinants, mechanisms, and interventions. Soc. Sci.Med. 2015;147(12):222–31. https://doi.org./: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.11.010

Secretaría de Gobernación y Comisión Nacional de los Derechos Humanos. Encuesta Nacional sobre Discriminación por motivos de Orientación Sexual e Identidad de Género (ENDOSID). México: Secretaría de Gobernación; 2018.

Brown S, Kucharska J, Marczak M. (2018). Mental health practitioners' attitudes towards transgender people: A systematic review of the literature. Int. J. Transgend. 2018; 19(1):4-24. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/15532739.2017.1374227

Hackimer L, Chen CY, Verkuilen J. Individual factors and cisgender college students' attitudes and behaviors toward transgender individuals. J. Community. Psychol. 2021;49(6):2023-39. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/jcop.22546.

Norton AT, Herek GM. Heterosexuals' attitudes toward transgender people: Findings from a national probability sample of U.S. adults. Sex. Roles. 2013;68(11-12):738-753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0110-6

Riggs DW, Webber K, Fell GR. Australian undergraduate psychology students’ attitudes towards trans people. Gay and Lesbian Issues and Psychology Review. 2012; 8(1):52-62.

Riggs DW, Sion R. Gender differences in cisgender psychologists’ and trainees’ attitudes toward transgender people. Psychol. Men. Masc. 2017;18(2):187–190. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000047

Worthen MGF, Lingiardi V, Caristo C. The Roles of Politics, Feminism, and Religion in Attitudes Toward LGBT Individuals: A Cross-Cultural Study of College Students in the USA, Italy, and Spain. Sex. Res. Soc. Policy. 2017; 14:241–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-016-0244-y

Maureira Cid F, Flores Ferro E, Gutiérrez Duarte SA, Gavoto Nogales O, Gastelum G. Conocimientos biológicos de homosexualidad y transsexualidad en estudiantes de actividad física en México. Biological knowledge of homosexuality and transsexuality instudents in the field of physical activity in México. Retos. 2022; 44:1162-68.

Rodríguez-Otero LM, Treviño-Martínez L. Sexismo y actitudes hacia la homosexualidad, la bisexualidad y la transexualidad en estudiantes de Trabajo Social mexicanos. Sexism and attitudes towards sexual diversity in Mexican students of social work. Glob. Soc. Work. 2016; 6(11):3-30. http://revistaseug.ugr.es/index.php/tsg/article/view/5181/pdf

Chon B, Burgos AM, Barajas MW. Construcción de una escala para medir actitudes hacia las personas transgénero en estudiantes universitarios. Enseñanza e Investigación en Psicología. 2018; 23(3):310-17.

Pratto F, Sidanius J, Stallworth LM, Malle BF. (1994). Social dominance orientation: a personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1994;(67):741-63.

Sidanius J, Pratto F, Van Laar C, Levin S. The Social Dominance Theory: Its Agenda and Method. Polit. Psychol. 2004; 25(6):845-80.

Silvan-Ferrero MP, Bustillos A. Adaptación de la Escala de Orientación a la Dominancia Social al castellano: validación de la Dominancia Grupal y la Oposición a la Igualdad como factores subyacentes. Rev. Psicol. Soc. 2007; 22(1):3-5.

WMA. Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. 2013. Retrieved from http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/index.html.WHO

Díaz Camarena A.J. Construir consciencia de género sobre hombres y masculinidades: una intervención. Revista de Estudios de Género, La ventana. 2013; 7(57):209-38. https://doi.org/10.32870/lv.v7i57.7508

Verdín Tello EF. Vatos! Masculinidades en colectivo. Proyecto interdisciplinario de intervención sobre masculinidades. Revista de Estudios de Género, La ventana. 2023; 7(57):239-75. https://doi.org/10.32870/lv.v7i57.7510

Statista. México: población por tipo de religión 2020.Disponible en https://es.statista.com/estadisticas/573120/practicantes-de-una-religion-segun-tipo-en-mexico/).

Mendoza-Pérez JC, Ortiz-Hernández L, Salazar-Ballesteros D. Situación de personas trans de México: Discriminación y salud. In: Hernández R. y Wilson A. (Editores). Diversidad sexual, discriminación y violencia: Desafíos para los derechos humanos en México. México DF: CNDH; 2018. p. 67–88.