Conscientious objection

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29057/mbr.v3i5.7457

Keywords:

bioethical, conscientious objection, autonomy

Abstract

Conscientious objection is a means of exercising freedom of belief, conscience and ethical convictions in the face of legal orders that could collide with their principles by excessively invading their autonomy. Although this right corresponds to every person, the health field is one of the most frequent to invoke it, generating bioethical dilemmas at the time of its exercise.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
0
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
No
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
53%
33%
Days to publication 
55
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Academic society 
N/A
Publisher 
Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo

References

CasaMadrid, O. (1999). Medical care and health law. JGH Editores.

CasaMadrid M., et al. (2004). Conscientious objection in physician practice. Retrieved May 5, 2021 from: http://www.ejournal.unam.mx/rfm/no49-3/RFM49310.pdf.

Durany, I. (1998). Objecciones de conciencia. Navarra Gráfica Ediciones.

León, F. (2007). Ethical-legal foundations of conscientious objection of health professionals. CONAMED Journal, 12(1), 3-8.

Rivera Flores, J., Acevedo-Medina, I. (2009). Conscientious objection and the anesthesiologist. Mexican Journal of Anesthesiology. 32(1), 156-158. https://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/rma/cma-2009/cmas091am.pdf.

Sierra, B. (2008). Conscientious objection in the medical-health field in Mexico. Revista Jurídica. Universidad Latina de America. http://www.unla.edu.mx/iusunla30/opinion/LA%20OBJECION%20DE%20CONCIENCIA%20EN%20EL%20AMBITO%20MEDICO-SANITARIO%20EN%20MEXICO.htm.

Downloads

Published

2021-07-05

How to Cite

Pacheco-Gómez, A. (2021). Conscientious objection. Mexican Bioethics Review ICSA, 3(5), 19–23. https://doi.org/10.29057/mbr.v3i5.7457