Impact of Technology on the Toothbrush

Jenny Lizbeth Alonso Leines

doi:10.29057/mjmr.v13i26.14574

Authors

Jenny Lizbeth Alonso Leines Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo, México https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3838-675X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29057/mjmr.v13i26.14574

Keywords:

Oral hygiene, Manual toothbrush, Electric toothbrush, Smart toothbrush, Biodegradable toothbrush, Dental prevention

Abstract

Oral health is a fundamental aspect for the general wellbeing of all people, as it directly affects quality of life and overall health. Maintaining good dental hygiene is key to preventing problems such as cavities, gum disease, bad breath and other oral disorders. However, many people do not brush effectively due to a lack of knowledge about proper technique and the tools necessary for complete oral hygiene.

This article aims to explore the different toothbrush options available, focusing especially on how technological advances have enabled the creation of innovative devices that enhance the brushing experience. Through a review of manual toothbrushes, electric toothbrushes and computer-assisted intelligent systems, it seeks to provide a clear view on the most effective tools for maintaining proper dental hygiene.

Aimed at anyone interested in improving their oral health, this article aims to teach how to choose the right toothbrush according to individual needs, in addition to presenting technological solutions that facilitate a correct brushing technique. It will also explore modern tools that, through interaction and learning, transform the dental hygiene process into a more effective and motivating experience, promoting a healthy smile over the years.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Publication Facts

This article

Author statements

Data availability

N/A

16%

External funding

No

32%

Competing interests

N/A

11%

This journal

Other journals

Articles accepted

70%

33%

Days to publication

131

145

Indexed in

DOAJ
GS

Editor & editorial board: profiles
Academic society: N/A
Publisher: Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo

References

[1] Ng MW, Chase I. Early childhood caries: risk-based disease prevention and management. Dent. Clin. North Am. 2013; 57(1): 1-16.

[2] Mathur VP, Dhillon JK. Dental Caries: a disease which needs attention. Indian J. Pediatr. 2018; 85(3): 202-6.

[3] Kagihara LE, Niederhauser VP, Stark M. Assessment, management, and prevention of early childhood caries. J. Am. Acad. Nurse Pract. 2009; 21(1): 1-10.

[4] Ikawa T, Mizutani K, Sudo T, Kano C, Ikeda Y, Akizuki T, et.al. Clinical comparison of an electric-powered ionic toothbrush and a manual toothbrush in plaque reduction: a randomized clinical trial. Int. J. Dent. Hyg. 2021; 19(1): 93-8.

[5] Axe A, Mueller WD, Rafferty H, Lang T, Gaengler P. Impact of manual toothbrush design on plaque removal efficacy. BMC Oral Health. 2023; 23(1): 796.

[6] Vinnichenko YA, Krikotina DV. Criteria for the choice of manual pediatric toothbrush. Stomatologiia (Mosk). 2015; 94(2): 58-64.

[7] Grimaldi R, Yonel Z, Chapple I, Butler A, Hall C, Reinbold K, et al. Randomised methodology development study to investigate plaque removal efficacy of manual toothbrushes. J. Dent. 2022; 116: 103830.

[8] Kim HJ, Lee JY, Lee ES, Kim DM, Jung UW, Cha JK, et al. A novel toothbrush with a thin-head, slender-neck and super-tapered bristles enhancing accessibility in hard-to-reach areas: a crossover randomized trial. BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1): 1186.

[9] Pérez-González F, Sáez-Alcaide LM, Sánchez-Labrador L, Mateos-Moreno MV, Garcillán-Izquierdo MR, Salgado-Peralvo AO. Comparison of the effectiveness of two manual toothbrushes: conventional design versus double-sided toothbrush design. A pilot study. Int. J. Dent. Hyg. 2024; 22(2): 452-7.

[10] Kaneyasu Y, Shigeishi H, Maehara T, Fukada-Sambuichi E, Amaro H, Sugiyama M. Measurement of bristle splaying of toothbrushes using digital imaging and evaluation of plaque removal efficacy over 3 months: A randomized controlled trial. Int. J. Dent. Hyg. 2020; 18(2): 173-81.

[11] Thomassen TMJA, Van der Weijden FA, Sälzer S, Slot DE. Cross-angled versus flat-trim bristle tuft configurations in manual toothbrushes: a systematic review. Int. J. Dent. Hyg. 2024; 22(4): 840-56.

[12] Hollaar VRY. Effectiveness of electric or manual toothbrush in dental plaque removal in patients with fixed orthodontic appliances. Ned. Tijdschr. Tandheelkd. 2021; 128(10): 475-8.

[13] Yankell SL, Shi X, Emling RC. Laboratory interproximal access efficacy comparison of a rippled bristles toothbrush and a flat manual toothbrush. J. Clin. Dent. 1993; 4(3): 82-4.

[14] Hamza B, Svellenti L, Körner P, Attin T, Wegehaupt FJ. Effect of tapered-end and round-end bristles on the abrasive dentine wear applying increasing brushing forces. Acta Odontol. Scand. 2022; 80(6): 465-9.

[15] Stiller S, Bosma ML, Shi X, Spirgel CM, Yankell SL. Interproximal access efficacy of three manual toothbrushes with extended, x-angled or flat multitufted bristles. Int. J. Dent. Hyg. 2010; 8(3): 244-8.

[16] Ranzan N, Gomes Muniz FWM, Rösing CK. Are bristle stiffness and bristle end-shape related to adverse effects on soft tissues during toothbrushing? A systematic review. Int. Dent. J. 2019; 69(3): 171-82.

[17] Voelker MA, Bayne SC, Liu Y, Walker MP. Catalogue of tooth brush head designs. J. Dent. Hyg. 2013; 87(3): 118-33.

[18] Acherkouk A, Götze M, Kiesow A, Ramakrishnan A, Sarembe S, Lang T, et al. Robot and mechanical testing of a specialist manual toothbrush for cleaning efficacy and improved force control. BMC Oral Health. 2022; 22(1): 225.

[19] Colvenkar S, Kunusoth R, Prakash R, Alwala AM, Ashok Kumar S. Individually modeled 3D printed toothbrush and interproximal brush handle with name for patients with limited manual dexterity. Cureus. 2022; 14(7): e27097.

[20] Warren P, Thompson M, Cugini M. Plaque removal efficacy of a novel manual toothbrush with MicroPulse bristles and an advanced split-head design. J. Clin. Dent. 2007; 18(2): 49-54.

[21] Keller M, Keller G, Eller T, Sigwart L, Wiesmüller V, Steiner R, et al. Cleansing efficacy of an auto-cleaning toothbrushing device with nylon bristles: a randomized-controlled pilot study. Clin. Oral Investig. 2023; 27(2): 603-11.

[22] Grender J, Williams K, Walters P, Klukowska M, Reick H. Plaque removal efficacy of oscillating-rotating power toothbrushes: review of six comparative clinical trials. Am. J. Dent. 2013; 26(2): 68-74.

[23] Biesbrock AR, Bayuk LM, Yates DS, Santana MV, Bartizek RD. The clinical effectiveness of a novel power toothbrush and its impact on oral health. J. Contemp. Dent. Pract. 2002; 3(2): 1-10.

[24] Biesbrock AR, Walters PA, Bartizek RD. The relative effectiveness of six powered toothbrushes for dental plaque removal. J. Clin. Dent. 2002; 13(5): 198-202.

[25] Elkerbout TA, Slot DE, Rosema NAM, Van der Weijden GA. How effective is a powered toothbrush as compared to a manual toothbrush? A systematic review and meta-analysis of single brushing exercises. Int. J. Dent. Hyg. 2020; 18(1): 17-26.

[26] Cugini M, Thompson M, Warren PR. Correlations between two plaque indices in assessment of toothbrush effectiveness. J. Contemp. Dent. Pract. 2006; 7(5): 1-9.

[27] Thomassen TMJA, Van der Weijden FGA, Slot DE. The efficacy of powered toothbrushes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Int. J. Dent. Hyg. 2022; 20(1): 3-17.

[28] Ni L, Tang R, He T, Chang J, Li J, Li S, et al. Clinical effect of a manual toothbrush with tapered filaments on dental plaque and gingivitis reduction. Am. J. Dent. 2017; 30(5): 272-8.

[29] Davidovich E, Shafir S, Shay B, Zini A. Paque removal by a powered toothbrush versus a manual toothbrush in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr. Dent. 2020; 42(4): 280-7.

[30] Elizondo ML, Rosa GM, Dos Santos Antola L, Gailiana AV. Manual versus electric toothbrush efficacy in the primary dentition: a randomized crossover clinical trial using image analysis of a digital photographs. J. Dent. Child. (Chic). 2023; 90(1): 31-8.

[31] Francis M, Hooper WJ, Worob D, Huy G, Santos S, Goyal CR, et.al. Comparative plaque removal efficacy of a new children´s powered toothbrush and a manual toothbrush: randomized, single use clinical study. Am. J. Dent. 2021; 34(6): 338-44.

[32] Xu Z, Cheng X, Conde E, Zou Y, Grender J, Ccahuana-Vasquez RA. Clinical assessment of a manual toothbrush with CrissCross and tapered bristle technology on gingivitis and plaque reduction. Am. J. Dent. 2019; 32(3): 107-12.

[33] Soldani FA, Lamont T, Jones K, Young L, Walsh T, Lala R, et al. One-to-one oral hygiene advice provided in a dental setting for oral health. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2018; 10(10): CD007447.

[34] Carra MC, Detzen L, Kitzmann J, Woelber JP, Ramseier CA, Bouchard P. Promoting behavioural changes to improve oral hygiene in patients with periodontal diseases: a systematic review. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2020; 47(Suppl 22): 72-89.

[35] Stoopler ET, Murdoch-Kinch CA. American Dental Association specialty recognition of oral medicine: implications for the dental profession. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2020; 151(7): 472-3.

[36] Gallob J, Petrone DM, Mateo LR, Chaknis P, Morrison BM Jr, Williams M, et al. Comparative efficacy of a soft toothbrush with tapered-tip bristles and an ADA reference toothbrush on established gingivitis and supragingival plaque over a 12-week period. J. Clin. Dent. 2016; 27(2): 39-47.

[37] Alayadi H, Alsiwat A, AlAkeel H, Alaskar M, Alwadi M, Sabbah W. Impact of virtual supervised tooth brushing on caries experience and quality of life among primary school children: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2023; 24(1): 118.

[38] Chen CH, Wang CC, Chen YZ. Intelligent brushing monitoring using a smart toothbrush with recurrent probabilistic neural network. Sensors (Basel). 2021; 21(4): 1238.

[39] Lucía B, Léna BK, Xavi C, Paniagua B, Pascual-La Rocca A. Efficacy of a new sonic powered toothbrush versus a manual toothbrush in a young population. A randomized cross-over clinical trial. Int. J. Dent. Hyg. 2023; 21(2): 382-8.

[40] Yang M, Yang J, Zhao Y, Wei H, Shang Y. Enhancement plaque control in preschool children by an intelligent brushing guide device. J. Clin. Pediatr. Dent. 2024; 48(2): 121-8.

[41] Yoshinaga Y, Oyama A, Ohgi K, Maruo N, Yamato H, Tsuchimochi N, et al. Efficacy of an electric toothbrush with monitor in dental plaque removal: a crossover randomized controlled trial. Cureus. 2024; 16(2): e55278.

[42] Akifusa S, Isobe A, Kibata K, Oyama A, Oyama H, Ariyoshi W, et al. Comparison of dental plaque reduction after use of electric toothbrushes with and without QLF-D-applied plaque visualization: a 1-week randomized controlled trial. BMC Oral Health. 2020; 20(1): 4.

[43] Kim KS, Yoon TH, Lee JW, Kim DJ. Interactive toothbrushing education by a smart toothbrush system via 3D visualization. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 2009; 96(2): 125-32.

[44] Jeong JS, Kim KS, Lee JW, Kim KD, Park W. Efficacy of tooth brushing via a three-dimensional motion tracking system for dental plaque control in school children: a randomized controlled clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2022; 22(1): 626.

[45] Kariya PB, Desai A, Singh S, Bansal B, Shah Y. Comparing plaque removal efficacy of biodegradable toothbrush and nonbiodegradable toothbrush in children of 8-10 years of age: A randomized clinical study. J. Indian Soc. Pedod. Prev. Dent. 2024; 42(2): 112-8.

[46] Fisher-Owens SA, Gansky SA, Platt LJ, Weintraub JA, Soobader MJ, Bramlett MD, et al. Influences on children's oral health: a conceptual model. Pediatrics. 2007; 120(3): e510-20.

[47] Saccomanno S, De Luca M, Saran S, Petricca MT, Caramaschi E, Mastrapasqua RF, et al. The importance of promoting oral health in schools: a pilot study. Eur. J. Transl. Myol. 2023; 33(1): 11158.

[48] Naidua RS, Nunn JH. Oral health knowledge, attitudes and behaviour of parents and caregivers of preschool children: Implications for oral health promotion. Oral Health Prev. Dent. 2020; 18(2): 245-52.