Influence of apathy in first grade adolescents in public high school on planning and decision making
Abstract
The present study analyzed the influence of apathy in planning and decision making in adolescents. With a population of 249 first-grade teenage students in the Public High School, EEVA apathy scale was registered to obtain a sample of 84 participants, three groups of 28 participants each were formed: Control group (GC) with low apathy , two with high apathy experimental group (GE) and experimental group with reward (GER). Subsequently, the planning task will be applied with the Tower of Hanoi test and the decision making with the Card Game. The results show that in the Hanoi test there are differences in the number of movements in the control and experimental groups with reward.
Downloads
References
Ross S.M., Dootson P. (2018) Do I Care? Pathological Apathy in the Context of Sustainable Consumption. In: Krey N., Rossi P. (eds) Back to the Future: Using Marketing Basics to Provide Customer Value. AMSAC 2017. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham
Marin, R. (1990). Differential diagnosis and classification of apathy. Am J Psychiatry, 147(1), 22-30.
Levy, R., & Dubois, B. (2005). Apathy and the Functional Anatomy of the Prefrontal Cortex–Basal Ganglia Circuits. Cerebral Cortex, 16(7), 916–928.
Frakey L.L. (2018) Apathy. In: Kreutzer J.S., DeLuca J., Caplan B. (eds) Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology. Springer, Cham
Marshall J.C. (2012) Apathy in Learning. In: Seel N.M. (eds) Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning. Springer, Boston, MA
Galván, A., & McGlennen, K. M. (2013). Enhanced Striatal Sensitivity to Aversive Reinforcement in Adolescents versus Adults. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(2), 284–296.
Beltrán, María del Carmen, Freyre, Miguel-Ángel, & Hernández-Guzmán, Laura. (2012). El Inventario de Depresión de Beck: Su validez en población adolescente. Terapia psicológica, 30(1), 5-13.
Díaz, A., Martín, R., Jiménez, J. E., García, E., Hernández, S., & Rodríguez, C. (2012). Torre de Hanoi: datos normativos y desarrollo evolutivo de la planificación. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 5(1), 79-91.
Squillace Louhau, M. R., Picón Janeiro, J. C., & Schmidt, V. I. (2015). Juego de Cartas, una tarea para la evaluación de toma de decisiones riesgosas: aportes a la validez ecológica y de constructo.
Widjojo, K. J Youth Adolescence (2018) 47: 1789. https://ebiblio.cetys.mx:4083/10.1007/s10964-018-0890-x
Boyer T.W., Byrnes J.P. (2016) Risk-Taking. In: Levesque R. (eds) Encyclopedia of Adolescence. Springer, Cham
