Analysis of the theories of Rubinstein, Leontiev and Galperin: a history of contradictions and misunderstandings that opens up new paths of development.
Abstract
The present work is inserted within the contemporary literature that tries to differentiate the different moments and contradictions in the works of the theorists of the Cultural-Historial and Activity theories, as well as the contradictions in the works of the different authors in different moments of their work. Specifically, it focuses on the theories of Rubinstein, Leontiev and Galperin to explore how they differed in their philosophical bases, and how this affects their understanding of the object of study of psychology, the process of internalization, and the pedagogical domain. The analysis leads us to understand the complicated relationships and contradictions in the work of these authors, and to propose some new avenues of development cor cultural-historical theories.
Downloads
References
Abul'khanova-Slavskaya, K. A. (1982). The category of activity in Soviet psychology. Soviet Psychology, 20(4), 3-36. https://doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-040520043
Bakhurst, D. (2009). Reflections on activity theory. Educational Review, 61(2), 197–210. doi:10.1080/00131910902846916
Bakhurst, D. (2006). Vygotsky’s Demons. En Daniels, H., Cole, M., & Wertsch, J. V. (2007). The Cambridge Companion to Vygotsky (pp. 50-76). New York: Cambridge.
Davydov, V. V., Zinchenko, V. P., & Talyzina, N. F. (1983). The problem of activity in the works of AN Leont'ev. Soviet Psychology, 21(4), 31-42. https://doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-0405210431
El'Konin, D. B. (1999). Toward the problem of stages in the mental development of children. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 37(6), 11-30. https://doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-0405370611
Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive Learning at Work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156. doi:10.1080/13639080020028747
Galperin, P. Y. (2021) Lectures in Psychology. En Engeness, I. (2021). PY Galperin's Development of Human Mental Activity: Lectures in Educational Psychology (pp. 1-103). Springer Nature.
Gal’perin, P. Y. (1967). On the Notion of Internalization. Soviet Psychology, 5(3), 28–33. doi:10.2753/rpo1061-0405050328
Gal'perin, P. Y. (1989). Organization of mental activity and the effectiveness of learning. Soviet Psychology, 27(3), 65-82. https://doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-0405270365
Gal'perin, P. Y. (1992). The problem of activity in Soviet psychology. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 30(4), 37-59.https://doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-0405300437
González Rey, F. (1989). Psicología, principios y categorías. La Habana: Ciencias Sociales.
González Rey, F. (2007). Investigación cualitativa y subjetividad: los procesos de construcción de la información. México, DF: McGraw-Hill Interamericana.
González Rey, F. (2011). El pensamiento de Vigotsky: contradicciones, desdoblamientos y desarrollo. México: Trillas.
González Rey, F. (2011a). A re-examination of defining moments in Vygotsky's work and their implications for his continuing legacy. Mind, culture, and activity, 18(3), 257-275.doi:10.1080/10749030903338517
González Rey, F. L. (2014). Advancing further the history of Soviet psychology: Moving forward from dominant representations in Western and Soviet psychology. History of Psychology, 17(1), 60–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035565
Karpov, Y. V. (2005). The neo-Vygotskian approach to child development. Cambridge University Press.
Kozulin, A. (1986). The concept of activity in Soviet psychology: Vygotsky, his disciples and critics. American Psychologist, 41(3), 264–274. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.3.264
Leontiev, N. A. (1981). Actividad conciencia y personalidad./N. A Leontiev. La Habana: Editorial Pueblo y Educación.
Leontiev, A. N. (2009). The development of mind: Selected works (pp. 140-248). Pacifica, CA: Marxists Internet Archive.
Leontiev, A. N. (2009a). An Outline of the Evolution of the Psyche. En Leontiev. A. N. (2009). The development of mind: Selected works (pp. 140-248). Pacifica, CA: Marxists Internet Archive.
Leontiev, A. N. (2009b). A Contribution to the Development of the Child’s Psyche. En Leontiev. A. N. (2009). The development of mind: Selected works (pp. 359-382). Pacifica, CA: Marxists Internet Archive.
Lísina, M. (1987). La génesis de las formas de comunicación en los niños. En Shuare (1987) La Psicologia Evolutiva y Pedagógica en la URSS: antologia (pp. 274-298). Moscou: Editorial Progresso
Lomov, B. F. (1982). The problem of activity in psychology. Soviet Psychology, 21(1), 55-91. https://doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-0405210155
Rivera Valdez, L. D., López Cortés, V. A., & García Flores, M. A. (2023). A proposal for monitoring the process of internalization following Galperin's conception. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1152541.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1152541
Rodríguez Ipiña, I., Rivera Valdez, L. D., & López Cortés, V. A. (2023). Evaluación Cualitativa en Mujeres Víctimas de Violencia de Pareja . DIVULGARE Boletín Científico De La Escuela Superior De Actopan, 10(20), 19-29. https://doi.org/10.29057/esa.v10i20.11053
Rubinstein, S. L. (1963). El Ser y la Conciencia. En Rubinstein, S. L. (1963). El Ser y la Conciencia y el Pensamiento y los Caminos de su Investigación (pp. 1-297). México, Editorial Grijalbo.
Rubinstein,. S. L. (1940/1964). Raíces Filosóficas de la Psciología Experimental. En Rubinstein. L. (1964). Problemas de la Psicología General (pp. 78-101). México Editorial Grijalbo
Rubinstein,. S. L. (1940/1964a). Reflexiones Sobre Psicología. En Rubinstein. L. (1964). Problemas de la Psicología General (pp. 103-113). México Editorial Grijalbo
Rubinstein,. S. L. (1959/1964b). Fundamentos filosóficos de la psicología: primeros manuscritos de K. Marx y problemas de la psicología. En Rubinsteins. L. (1964). Problemas de la Psicología General. México Editorial Grijalbo.
Rubinstein, S. L. (1974). El Desarrollo de la Psicología: Principios y Métodos. Argentina, Editorial Grijalbo
Rubinštejn, S. L. (1987). Problems of Psychology in the Works of Karl Marx. Studies in Soviet Thought, 33(2), 111–130. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20100205
Sukhikh, V. L., Veresov, N. N., & Veraksa, N. E. (2022). Dramatic Perezhivanie as a driver of executive functions development through role-play in early childhood: Theoretical framework and experimental evidence. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 1057209.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1057209
Talizina, N. (2019). La teoría de la actividad aplicada a la enseñanza. Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla.
Van der Veer, R., & Valsiner, J. (1991). Understanding Vygotsky: A quest for synthesis. Blackwell Publishing.
Veresov, N. (2005). Marxist and non-Marxist aspects of the cultural-historical psychology of LS Vygotsky. Outlines. Critical Practice Studies, 7(1), 31-49.DOI: https://doi.org/10.7146/ocps.v7i1.2110
Veresov, N. (2006). Leading activity in developmental psychology: concept and principle. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 44(5), 7-25.https://doi.org/10.2753/RPO1
Veresov, N. (2016). Perezhivanie as a phenomenon and a concept: Questions on clarification and methodological meditations. Cultural-historical psychology, 12(3), 129-148. doi: 10.17759/chp.2016120308
Veresov, N. (2022). Cultural-historical research methodology for studying of child’s development: concepts and principles. Psicologia da Educação, (54), 96-106.https://doi.org/10.23925/2175-3520.2022i54espp96-106
Veresov, N., & Fleer, M. (2016). Perezhivanie as a Theoretical Concept for Researching Young Children’s Development. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 23(4), 325–335. doi:10.1080/10749039.2016.1186198 10.1080/10749039.2016.1186198
Vygotsky, L.S. (2012). El Significado Histórico de la Crisis de ls Psicología. En Obras Escogidas I (pp. 257-413). Machado Nuevo Aprendizaje.
Vygotsky, L.S. (2012a) Historia del Desarrollo de las Funciones Psíquicas Superiores. Obras Escogidas III (pp. 11-340). Machado Nuevo Aprendizaje.
Copyright (c) 2024 Leonardo Daniel Rivera Valdez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.