Mecatrónica educativa: soporte de la enseñanza-aprendizaje de educación básica en Hidalgo

Juan Carlos González-Islas; Gildardo Godínez-Garrido; Angelina González-Rosas; Blanca-Andrea Ortega-Marín

doi:10.29057/icbi.v9iEspecial.7197

Juan Carlos González-Islas Universidad Tecnológica de Tulancingo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2190-0660
Gildardo Godínez-Garrido Universidad Tecnológica de Tulancingo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5462-4818
Angelina González-Rosas Universidad Tecnológica de Tulancingo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5631-0281
Blanca-Andrea Ortega-Marín Área Electromecánica Industrial – Ingeniería en Energías Renovables https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6821-8239

DOI: https://doi.org/10.29057/icbi.v9iEspecial.7197

Keywords: Educational mechatronics, basic secondary education, Teaching-learning process, Educational technology and innovation

Abstract

At present, Mexico finds itself in the middle of a great advancement in science, technology, and innovation via the development of projects which fulfil current needs and are supported by the educational sector. The state of Hidalgo is no exception and as a result, educators and students alike from the Universidad Tecnológica de Tulancingo have joined the effort with a goal of encouraging interest by basic education students in the areas of science, technology, and innovation and by strengthening the teaching and learning processes at the basic education level. In this article, we will present the methodology of implementation as well as development methods for prototypes and didactic materials with a new focus based on educational mechatronics designed for a basic education level at each institution. Finally, we will outline the most significant qualitative results since the 2016 launch of this approach in diverse scenarios, an analysis which will permit us to determine the pedagogical and technological feasibility of such an approach on a statewide scale.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cibrián-Anaya Zibrian Ricardo, Luque-Vega Luis Fernando y López-Neri Emmanuel. (2019). Transición de la robótica educativa: Caso de estudio: Ladrillo inteligente EV3 y Control Lógico Programable, Universo de la Tecnología, ISSN:2007-1450, Año 12, V1, Edición 34, sep-dic 2019, 19-22.

Dawes, J., Stocchi, L. & Dall’Olmo-Riley, F. (2020). Over-time variation in individual’s customer satisfaction scores. International Journal of Market Research, 62(3), 262-271.

Elizalde-Huerta, C. I. (2017). Kit de prácticas para fundamentos de robótica. [Tesis de Ingeniería en Mecatrónica, Universidad Tecnológica de Tulancingo]. Repositorio digital UTEC Tulancingo.

Gobierno del Estado de Hidalgo. (2016). Plan Estatal de Desarrollo, 2016-2022.

Halinen, I. & Järvinen, R. (2008). Towards inclusive education: the case of Finland. Prospects, 38(1), 77-97.

Hussin, A. A. (2018). Education 4.0 made simple: Ideas for teaching. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 6(3), 92-98.

Kananoja, T. A. P. A. N. I. (2009). Technology education in general education in Finland. International handbook of research and development in technology education, 51-64.

Kawamoto, Mari. (2015). Scientific and Technical Education in Japan’s Junior and Senior High Schools National Institute for Research Advancement (NIRA).

King, John B. & Russell Shilling. (2016). STEM 2026, A Vision for Innovation in STEM Education U.S. Department of Education, Office of Innovation and Improvement.

Krach, Keith. (2017). 13 de las últimas tendencias en tecnología educativa, Cofundador y CEO Ariba, presidente de Purdue University, presidente de Angie´s y vicepresidente de General Motors, consultado por última vez 7 de abril de 2021, https://medium.com/@KeithKrach/13-of-the-latest-trends-in-educational-technology-e2368e36f7a0.

Lonka, Kirsti. (2020). Aprendizaje extraordinario Finlandia, Colección Educación Siglo del Hombre Editores.

Universidad de los Andes/Ediciones Uniandes. Colombia.

Lopez-Garcia, T. J., Alvarez-Cedillo, J. A., Sanchez, T. A., and Vicario-Solorzano, C. M. (2019). Review of trends in the educational model of distance education in Mexico, towards an education 4.0. Computer Reviews Journal, 3, 111-121.

Luque-Vega, Luis F., López-Neri, Emmanuel, Santoyo, Anayeli, Ruíz-Duarte, Jorge & Farrera-Vázquez, N. (2019). Educational methodology based on active learning for Mechatronics Engineering students: towards educational mechatronics. Computación y Sistemas, Vol. 23, No. 2, 2019, 325-333. doi: 10.13053/CyS-23-2-3196.

Olechowski, A. L., Eppinger, S. D., Joglekar, N., & Tomaschek, K. (2020). Technology readiness levels: Shortcomings and improvement opportunities. Systems Engineering, 23(4), 395-408).

Roldan-Aguirre, J. (2017). Desarrollo de aplicación móvil para control de sistema mecatrónico. [Tesis de Ingeniería en Mecatrónica, Universidad Tecnológica de Tulancingo]. Repositorio digital UTEC Tulancingo.

Scolari, Carlos A. (2018). Adolescentes, medios de comunicación y culturas colaborativas. Fundación Colección Ceibal. ISBN 978-84-09-00293-1, 978-84-09-00292-4. Consultado 07042021. Disponible en https://digital.fundacionceibal/jspui/handle/123456789/247

Secretaria de Educación Pública. (2017). Resumen ejecutivo de la Reforma educativa Consultado por última vez el 24 de septiembre de 2017 en el sitio: http://seduc.edomex.gob.mx/sites/seduc.edomex.gob.mx/files/files/Padres%20de%20familia/Resumen_Ejecutivo_de_la_Reforma_Educativa.pdf.