Spoken word recognition in French

A study about the effects of phonological neighborhood density

Abstract

Different linguistic factors can influence the recognition of spoken words in French. We are interested in the impact of the linguistic factor of phonological density, which refers to the number of phonological neighbours of words and which is related to the recognition process according to a principle of inhibition and lexical competition. By using a lexical decision task, where half of the words have a low phonological density, and the other half a high phonological density, we aim to measure the reaction times of a group of young French-speaking participants (18-35 years old). The results of the young French-speaking group did not show a phonological density effect, however, these results did show a lexicality effect, demonstrating that the word and pseudo-word recognition task worked well. Thus, from the error analyses, the involvement of another factor, word familiarity, was induced. The post-experimental survey on this new factor showed an imbalance between the high and low density groups. By removing the low familiarity items from the analysis, a significant phonological density effect was obtained at this time. It is essential to discuss the role of word familiarity on spoken word recognition; as well as the material development for spoken word recognition tasks.

 

Downloads

Keine Nutzungsdaten vorhanden.

Literaturhinweise

Amano, S., Kondo, T., Sakamoto, S., & Suzuki, Y. (2006). Influence of word familiarity on spoken word recognition. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120(5), 3322-3322

Bochkarev, V.; Solovyev, V.; Wichmann, S. (2014). Universals versus historical contingencies in lexical evolution. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 11(101), 20140841–20140841.

Connine, C. M., Mullennix, J., Shernoff, E., & Yelen, J. (1990). Word familiarity and frequency in visual and auditory word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(6), 1084.

Referencias

Amano, S., Kondo, T., Sakamoto, S., & Suzuki, Y. (2006). Influence of word familiarity on spoken word recognition. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120(5), 3322-3322

Bochkarev, V.; Solovyev, V.; Wichmann, S. (2014). Universals versus historical contingencies in lexical evolution. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 11(101), 20140841–20140841.

Connine, C. M., Mullennix, J., Shernoff, E., & Yelen, J. (1990). Word familiarity and frequency in visual and auditory word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(6), 1084.

Dufour, S., & Nguyen, N. (2017). Does talker‐specific information influence lexical competition? Evidence from phonological priming. Cognitive science, 41(8), 2221-2233.

Dufour, S., Peereman, R., Pallier, C., & Radeau, M. (2002). VoCoLex: Une base de données lexicales sur les similarités phonologiques entre les mots français. Année psychologique, 102(4), 725-745.

Gahl, S., & Strand, J. F. (2016). Many neighborhoods: Phonological and perceptual neighborhood density in lexical production and perception. Journal of Memory and Language, 89, 162–178.

Ganong, W. F. (1980). Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception. Journal of experimental psychology: Human perception and performance, 6(1), 110.

Grosjean, F. (1985). The recognition of words after their acoustic offset: Evidence and implications. Perception & Psychophysics, 38(4), 299-310.

Hunter, C. R. (2016). Is the time course of lexical activation and competition in spoken word recognition affected by adult aging? An event-related potential (ERP) study. Neuropsychologia, 91, 451–464.

Leroy, G., & Kauchak, D. (2014). The effect of word familiarity on actual and perceived text difficulty. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 21(e1), e169-e172.

Les principes de la transcription phonétique, dans le dictionnaire en ligne Usito. https://usito.usherbrooke.ca/articles/métadonn ées/phonetiquePrincipes

Luce, P.A. & Pinsoni, D.B. (1998). Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear & Hearing, 19, pages 1–36.

Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken wordrecognition. Cognition, 25(1-2), 71-102.

McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive psychology, 18(1), 1-86.

Pagel, Mark; Atkinson, Quentin D.; Meade, Andrew (2007). Frequency of word-use predicts rates of lexical evolution throughout Indo-European history. 449(7163), 717–720. doi:10.1038/nature06176

Smith, K. (2004). The evolution of vocabulary. Journal of theoretical biology, 228(1), 127-142.

Whiteside, S. P., & Varley, R. A. (1999). Verbo-motor priming in the phonetic encoding of real and non-words. In Sixth European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology.

Veröffentlicht
2023-11-05
Zitationsvorschlag
Tiscareño, I. (2023). Spoken word recognition in French. Revista Lengua Y Cultura, 5(9), 70-79. https://doi.org/10.29057/lc.v5i9.11461